The Clinical Usefulness of a Tiger Catheter in Diagnostic Coronary Angiography via the Transradial Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The most important complications of the transradial coronary approach during coronary artery angiography are occlusion of the radial artery and arterial spasm which are known to be influenced by catheter size, procedure time, and repeat procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a Tiger catheter (TC) which was designed for the selection of right and left coronary artery ostia simultaneously, compared with the Judgkins catheter (JC) during transradial coronary angiography (CAG). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients were randomized between groups who underwent CAG with a standard 5F JC or a TC. The procedure time and vasospasm of the radial artery, which were expressed as stenosis of the vessel diameter, were examined using a transradial approach. Four parts of the blood vessel diameter were measured at baseline, during injection of the vasodilator, and at the end of the procedure. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in gender, age, weight, or other cardiovascular risk factors between the two groups of patients. CAG was successfully performed using a TC in 89% of the patients. A TC was associated with a significantly shorter total procedure time than the JC for diagnostic CAG (451+/-120.4 vs. 542.3+/-180.5 sec, p=0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in stenosis between the two groups (36% vs. 41% in TC and JC, respectively, p=0.358). There were no angiographic or clinical complications in each group. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the TC is associated with decreased total CAG procedure time compared with the JC.

The Clinical Effects and Radial Artery Vasodilation After High Dose Nicorandil Solution During Coronary Angiography via the Radial Artery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A spasm of the radial artery is one of the most common complications of coronary angiography (CAG) via the transradial approach (TR), and this spasm sometimes disturbs the procedure. Nicorandil has recently shown dose-dependent dilatation of the blood vessels and ischemic preconditioning. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical effects and radial artery vasodilation of high dose nicorandil solution during CAG via the radial artery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized study to compare the effects of 12 mg of nicorandil (the Nicorandil group) and 10 mL of a cocktail solution (nitroglycerine 200 microgram mixed with verapamil 100 microgram) (the Cocktail group) in 146 patients. Vasospasms, which were expressed as the stenosis of the radial artery were examined at 2 parts of the radial artery. RESULTS: There were no significant difference of gender, age and risk factors for the 2 groups of patients. The reductions in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) 1 minute after drug administration were 33.6+/-11.4/10.4+/-7.7 mmHg in the Nicorandil group and 12.8+/-9.8/3.8+/-5.3 mmHg in the Cocktail group (p<0.001). Both vasodilating agents showed significant radial artery vasodilation after administration of the drugs (p<0.005 for all). The minimal luminal diameter (MLD) after drug administration was more dilated in the Nicorandil group than that in the Cocktail group (0.63+/-0.25 mm vs. 0.48+/-0.19 mm, respectively, p=0.013). CONCLUSION: Nicorandil solution was more effective for inducing vasodilation of the radial artery, but it was not clinical superior to the cocktail solution.